Cases 1 - 10 of 566
(PC) Iseli v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
William D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Superior Courts of Glynn County et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Imare' Damu' F.J. Franklin
Defendant:
Superior Courts of Glynn County and William Bill Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Imare' Damu' F.J. Franklin
Defendant:
William Bill Johnson, Rebecca J. Walden and District Attorney's of Glynn County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Roberson et al
as 1:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Crystyn Jeanette Smith-Thomas
Defendant:
Alma C. Roberson, Geoffrey Cummings, Albuquerque Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Regional Supplemental Services Inc et al
as 0:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Johnson, III
Defendant:
Regional Supplemental Services Inc and Management Specialty Services 109 Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Harnett County Detention Center
as 5:2024ct03046
Plaintiff:
William Kirk Johnson
Defendant:
Harnett County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Iseli v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch and William D Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Johnson v. R. Hudgins
as 23-6915
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM ANTHONY JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
R. HUDGINS, Warden
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02785
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FRANKLIN JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
