Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Barth v. Town of Waterboro, et al
as 24-1170
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. BARTH
Defendant:
TOWN OF WATERBORO, GARY LAMB, SAMUEL G. JOHNSON and others
Colon v. Noradin et al
as 1:2023cv16798
Plaintiff:
Edgardo Colon
Defendant:
Anthony F. Noradin, Samuel J. Cirone, William Brogan and others
Petitioner:
Tyrone Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clay v. Noradin, et al
as 1:2023cv16799
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Clay
Defendant:
Anthony F. Noradin, Samuel J. Cirone, William Brogan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ricky Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Colgate Palmolive Co, et al
as 23-2982
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
Defendant / Appellee:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO, HILLS PET NUTRITION, NATURASOURCE INTERNATIONAL LLC and others
Defendant:
MS. KIM, DEBRA NICHOLS, DAVE BALOGA and others
Smith v. Wigman et al
as 3:2023cv50105
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith
Defendant:
Gary Wigman, Michael Kostecki, William Brogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD v. COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv06623
Plaintiff:
RICKY E. KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
Defendant:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY, HILL'S PET NUTRITION INC, NATURASOURCE INTERNATIONAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barth v. Town of Waterboro, et al
as 21-1513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN S. BARTH
Defendant / Appellee:
WATERBORO, ME, GARY LAMB, JONATHAN WILLIAM BROGAN and others
Roberts v. Brogan et al
as 2:2017cv00865
Defendant:
William Brogan and Darci M Poloni
Plaintiff:
William Scott Roberts
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Brogan et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv12502
Plaintiff:
Lilian Brogan and William Brogan
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Booker v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv00732
Defendant:
The City of Chicago , William Brogan , T. Vovos and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Booker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
