Cases 1 - 10 of 10
King et al v. Commissioner Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2015cv01303
Plaintiff:
Sharmaine King and Chastity Parham
Defendant:
Commissioner Department of Human Services, State of Tennessee Governor, Deborah Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Williams v. Warden, et al
as 15-12040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM D. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, ROBERT FLORES, Asst. Warden, SCOTT PAYNE and others
Williams et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01955
Plaintiff:
Berna L. Williams and William D. Williams
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as MOE/4:14-cv-01044
Plaintiff:
Berna L. Williams and William D. Williams
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc. , Biomet Orthopedics, LLC , Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC and others
Williams et al v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01044
Plaintiff:
Berna L. Williams and William D. Williams
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc. , Biomet Orthopedics, LLC , Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Williams v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 12-16077
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM D. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
WILLIAMS v. HALEY
as 4:2012cv00142
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D WILLIAMS
Defendant:
HALEY , ROBERT FLORES , SCOTT PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Williams v. Secretary, DOC, et al
as 10-15478
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM D. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Smith
as 1:2008cv00355
Petitioner:
William D. Williams
Respondent:
Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
