Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Friedman v. Martin et al
as 3:2019cv30062
Defendant:
Greenfield, City of and William F. Martin
Plaintiff:
Karen A. Friedman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Noble County Board of Commissioners
as 1:2018cv00349
Defendant:
Noble County Board of Commissioners
Plaintiff:
William F Martin and William F Martin, Jr
Intervenor Defendant:
George Gerdes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tidewater Marine, LLC v. Martin
as 2:2013cv00555
Plaintiff:
Tidewater Marine, LLC
Defendant:
William F. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
William Martin, Jr. v. Ross Burton
as 12-1895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM F. MARTIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSS ALAN BURTON, Public Defender Attorney of the Commission Office of Indigent Defense Sixteenth Judicial Circuit to be sued in this Individual and Official Capacity
William Martin, Jr. v. Kevin Brackett
as 12-1896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM F. MARTIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN SCOTT BRACKETT, Solicitor of the Sixteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Union and York County to be sued in his Individual and Official Capacity
Martin v. Burton
as 0:2012cv01088
Plaintiff:
William F Martin, Jr
Defendant:
Ross Alan Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Brackett
as 0:2012cv00054
Plaintiff:
William F Martin, Jr
Defendant:
Kevin Scott Brackett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. SCDC
as 9:2011cv00829
Plaintiff:
William F Martin, Jr
Defendant:
SC Dept of Corrections HQ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. SCDC et al
as 3:2011cv00829
Plaintiff:
William F Martin, Jr
Defendant:
SC Dept of Corrections HQ and David Tatarsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
