Cases 11 - 20 of 199
Foster, III v. Nye et al
as 4:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
William Henry Foster, III
Defendant:
George Nye, David Setzer and Bradley Hipps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv03150
Defendant:
Cook County Health Care Dispensary, Tom Dart, C/O's of 7-3 Shift and others
Plaintiff:
William Henry Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv02983
Defendant:
Name(s) Unknown: (Entire) Cook, Name Unknown: Dir. of Security, County Administration and others
Plaintiff:
William Henry Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cain v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv01431
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
William Henry Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schmidt v. State of Washington
as 2:2020cv01819
Petitioner:
William Henry Schmidt
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DeVary v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc.
as 1:2020cv03619
Plaintiff:
William Henry DeVary, Jr.
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Fears v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2020cv00442
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
William Henry Fears, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stephens v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv00653
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
William Henry Stephens, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Payton v. Cox et al
as 2:2020cv04838
Defendant:
Tom Olinger, Andrew Cox, Dave Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
William Henry Payton
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 3:2020cv01027
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General, Florida Department of Corrections and Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
William Henry Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
