Cases
MCNEIL v. CHIODO et al
as 3:2023cv00127
Plaintiff: WILLIAM MCNEIL
Defendant: OFFICER RYAN CHIODO, OFFICER JOHN DOE 1 and OFFICER JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00963
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Zorn et al v. McNeil et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv00001
Plaintiff: Katrine Zorn , Erin Daley , Walter Pooley and others
Defendant: William McNeil and City of Casselberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01033
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeil v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv12539
Plaintiff: William McNeil
Defendant: FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laskowski et al v. Fresenius USA Inc et al
as 1:2015cv10299
Plaintiff: Joseph Laskowski , Martin Marshall , Kandice McHand and others
Defendant: Fresenius U.S.A., Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing Inc. , Fresenius USA Marketing Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Laskowski et al v. Fresenius USA Inc et al
as 5:2014cv01154
Plaintiff: Joseph Laskowski , Martin Marshall , Kandice McHand and others
Defendant: Fresenius USA Inc , Fresenius USA Manufacturing Inc , Fresenius USA Marketing Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCNEIL v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv02120
Plaintiff: WILLIAM MCNEIL
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZAHN v. MCNEIL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00306
Petitioner: PAUL E ZAHN
Respondent: WILLIAM MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?