Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Monroe v. Kubat et al
as 1:2015cv01827
Plaintiff:
William Monroe
Defendant:
Ronald M. Kubat, TA Operating LLC and Great West Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
William McBride v. Lloyd Rapelje
as 14-1038
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM MONROE MCBRIDE
Respondent - Appellee:
LLOYD RAPELJE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. APPROXIMATELY 266 VEHICLES
as 1:2013cv00289
Claimant:
OSCAR AGUILAR NOLASCO, SUSANA CHAVEZ, JAMES DESPAIN and others
Defendant:
APPROXIMATELY 266 VEHICLES and SHANE A. MCDONALD
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Monroe et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv00001
Defendant:
Robert Anderson, City of New York and Alessandro Longardino
Plaintiff:
William Monroe and Robert Sadhoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MONROE et al v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
as 1:2012cv00746
Plaintiff:
Shirley Monroe and WILLIAM MONROE, JR.
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gudson et al v. IPEX Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00993
Plaintiff:
Ronald Adams, Sheila Adams, Anthony Affuso and others
Defendant:
IPEX Inc. and IPEX USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Smith v. Barrow County Detention Center
as 2:2011cv00028
Plaintiff:
William Monroe Smith
Defendant:
Barrow County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monroe et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2010cv00401
Plaintiff:
William Monroe
Defendant:
Jennifer Smith, David Diaz and E. Metz
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monroe et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 3:2010cv00639
Plaintiff:
Shirley Monroe and William Monroe, Jr.
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
