Cases 11 - 20 of 30
PRINCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv01813
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PRINCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bautista et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2019cv00116
Defendant:
Natchet Williams-Prince, ABC Corp., Cassandra Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Deisy Davila Bautista, Guardian for Angie Zue Brooks and Janniel Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Prince v. Kansas City Tree Care, LLC
as 2:2019cv02653
Defendant:
Kansas City Tree Care, LLC
Plaintiff:
William Prince
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prince v. Kansas City Tree Care, LLC
as 4:2019cv00622
Defendant:
Kansas City Tree Care, LLC
Plaintiff:
William Prince
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216
WOODEN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01054
Defendant:
BARRY CHARLES, EUGENE KITTLES, DONALD CAIN and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND CENAKA WOODEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moy et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12334
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MOY, Terence Purdon, Chang Duck Yoon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
PRINCE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv00714
Plaintiff:
MARY D PRINCE and WILLIAM PRINCE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prince v. Perfect Delivery Inc et al
as 8:2017cv01950
Plaintiff:
William Prince
Defendant:
Perfect Delivery Inc and Perfect Delivery North America Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Prince v. Colvin
as 5:2015cv00547
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
William Prince
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Prince v. QS America, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02033
Plaintiff:
William Prince
Defendant:
QS America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
