Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Harris v. Fambro et al
as 5:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
William R Harris
Defendant:
Jonathon Ramon Fambro, NC Special Police LLC, Christopher Biggerstaff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris, Jr. v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv02811
Plaintiff:
William R. Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Estate of William R. Harris, Jr.
as 3:2015cv00358
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Estate of William R. Harris, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
WHITLOCK v. BUSS et al
as 1:2010cv01468
Defendant:
EDWIN G. BUSS, INDIANA PAROLE BOARD MEMBERS, GREGORY D. SERVER; RANDELL P. GENTRY; THOR R. MILLER; VALERIE J. PARKER, AND WILLIAM R. HARRIS and BRUCE C. LEMMON
Plaintiff:
FLOYD E. WHITLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mary Harris, et al v. SunTrust Bank
as 10-12440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY C. HARRIS, RAYMOND HARRIS and WILLIAM R. HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SUNTRUST BANK
Mary C. Harris, et al v. SunTrust Bank
as 10-11653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND HARRIS, MARY C. HARRIS and WILLIAM R. HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SUNTRUST BANK
Gibbs-El v. Hegewald et al
as 4:2009cv00096
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Gibbs-El
Defendant:
Art Hegewald, Christopher E Meloy, Randall P Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKS v. BUSS et al
as 1:2009cv01174
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY PARKS
Defendant:
EDWIN BUSS, J. DAVID DONAHUE, JIM WYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bleeke et al v. Buss et al
as 1:2009cv00228
Plaintiff:
David Bleeke, David Bleeke, Melissa Bleeke and others
Defendant:
Edwin G Buss, Gregory Server, Randall P Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William R. Harris, et al. v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd., et al.
as PAE/2:87-CV-05016
Plaintiff:
William R. Harris
Defendant:
Asbestos Corp., Ltd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
