Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ayala et al v. City of Medford
as 1:2022cv10115
Plaintiff:
Noel Ayala, Antonio Alvia, John Bailey and others
Defendant:
City of Medford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
STANFORD, JR. v. COCHRAN et al
as 2:2021cv20585
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STANFORD, JR.
Defendant:
GREGORY COCHRAN, WS THOMAS TRANSFER, LLC, ONLINE TRANSPORT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STANFORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv33569
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STANFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joseph Bailey v. City of Ann Arbor, et al
as 16-2564
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
JOSEPH BAILEY
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
CITY OF ANN ARBOR, CHRISTOPHER FITZPATRICK, WILLIAM STANFORD and others
Joseph Bailey v. Cty of Ann Arbor, et al
as 16-2478
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSEPH BAILEY
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF ANN ARBOR, CHRISTOPHER FITZPATRICK, WILLIAM STANFORD and others
Stanford v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2016cv01745
Plaintiff:
Guy William Stanford, Sr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bailey v. Ann Arbor, City of et al
as 2:2014cv12002
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bailey
Defendant:
Ann Arbor, City of, Christopher Fitzpatrick, William stanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanford et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv28785
Plaintiff:
Georgia Stanford and William Stanford
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanford v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
Steven William Stanford
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stanford III v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv00972
Plaintiff:
William Stanford III
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
