Cases 1 - 10 of 13
RAINES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03476
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP WILLIAM RAINES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ACKERMAN et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv01774
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ACKERMAN, JORGE IBRAIN ADRIAN, JOSE DIMAS ALFARO and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ackerman et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02686
Plaintiff:
Alexander Ackerman, Jorge Ibrain Adrian, Jose Dimas Alfaro and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
BEY v. RAINS et al
as 1:2022cv06950
Plaintiff:
KHALID RASOUL BEY
Defendant:
WILLIAM RAINS, TASHA JIMENEZ and LAKISHA COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jaime Aguirre et al v. Kathryn Barger et al
as 2:2022cv06676
Plaintiff:
Jaime Aguirre, Michael Almeraz, Vanazqe Banks and others
Defendant:
Kathryn Barger, Janice Hahn, Holly Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAINES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08631
Plaintiff:
CARL WILLIAM RAINES, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Raines v. Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01195
Plaintiff:
William Raines
Defendant:
Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc. and Pfizer, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2012mc00050
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RAINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rains et al v. SQM North American Corporation
as 4:2010cv00081
Plaintiff:
Ashley Rains and William rains
Defendant:
SQM North American Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
