Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Randall Otvos v. State of North Carolina
as 23-2225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDALL OTVOS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, WILKES COUNTY, DEPUTY LANDEN JAMES-DEAN BYRD, Wilkes County Office Employee and others
Otvos v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Randall Otvos
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, County of Wilkes, Landen James-Dean Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brooks v. City of Rochester et al
as 1:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
William H. Brooks
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Ronald Reinstein, Randall Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. TRANS UNION LLC
as 2:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
William Norman Brooks, III
Defendant:
TRANS UNION LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Vazquez v. Brooks
as 4:2021cv00954
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Olvera Vazquez
Defendant:
William F. Brooks doing business as New Beginnings Steel Erection
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Khouri et al v. Brooks, Jr. et al
as 5:2021cv00254
Plaintiff:
Nina Y. Khouri and Fuad Khouri
Defendant:
Kingspan Insulation LLC and William A. Brooks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEVY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER , INC. et al
as 3:2020cv18967
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MATTHEWS BROOKS and PAM RORKE LEVY
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William BrooksIn re: William Brooks
as 20-3063
In Re:
In re: William H. Brooks, also known as William H. Seals, also known as Puddin
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01348
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
