Cases 91 - 100 of 27,261
Wilson v. USA
as 2:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Willie Roy Wilson, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Barnes v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Willie Barnes
Defendant:
A. Quiros, Martin, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Google Company et al
as 1:2024cv01446
Plaintiff:
Mr. Willie Cal Walker
Defendant:
Google Company, infro@referleadersettlement.com, Horizon Acturial Settlement Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Warner v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner, Jr
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Tracy Reveal, Chae Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Willis
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jeff Parker
Defendant:
Melissa T Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Starkey v. Hillsborough County Jail et al
as 8:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Willie Joe Starkey
Defendant:
Hillsborough County Jail, Suzan Lopez, Juliann M. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Willis and Catrina Willis
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Harris v. Reeves et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Defendant:
Robert S. Reeves, Cathy S. Palmer, Ralph Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PHELPS v. WARDEN PERRY
as 7:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
WILLIE C PHELPS
Respondent:
WARDEN PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
