Cases 71 - 80 of 27,233
PHELPS v. WARDEN PERRY
as 7:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
WILLIE C PHELPS
Respondent:
WARDEN PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
WILLIE v. WELLPATH, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Diane Harris Willie and Akeem Juwan Willie
Defendant:
WELLPATH, LLC, Karen Aloise, Jessica Rummel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-1958
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
FREYA BRIER, MOSHE ADMON, CITY OF SEATTLE and others
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv00980
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hobby v. Dept of Corr
as 3:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Willie Hobby
Defendant:
Dept of Corr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER, DCH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, SONOMA VALLEY HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Bates v. Warden
as 3:2024cv01011
Petitioner:
Willie B Bates, III
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. Childes et al
as 3:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Willie Robinson
Defendant:
Kevin Childes, Jason Dunn and Wexford Health Source
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
