Cases 1 - 10 of 112
DIXON v. SEMINO et al
as 1:2023cv00145
Defendant:
JODY E. WINDER, GINA SEMINO, C.O. CARLOS and others
Not Classified By Court:
JIMITA RACHEL DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Henderson et al
as 3:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Hudson
Defendant:
K. Henderson, Rodale Lewis, Holy Winder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seybold v. Binegar et al
as 1:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
Josephus Seybold
Defendant:
Liberty Binegar, Travis Binegar, Miles Winder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Buchanan County Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv06097
Plaintiff:
Valdez McDonald
Defendant:
Buchanan County Police Department, Patrick Robb, Broadus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winder v. United States Marshals (BOP)
as 2:2022cv02102
Petitioner:
Aaron Winder
Respondent:
United States Marshals (BOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Winder v. Worcester Recovery Center and Hospital et al
as 4:2021cv40113
Plaintiff:
Lora Winder
Defendant:
Worcester Recovery Center and Hospital and T.Frank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. SCHILTZ et al
as 2:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
JASPER R ADAMS
Defendant:
DETECTIVE JAMES SCHILTZ, BARROW COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and Winder Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. SCHILTZ et al
as 5:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
JASPER R ADAMS
Defendant:
DETECTIVE JAMES SCHILTZ, BARROW COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and WINDER POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winder v. Gomez
as 6:2021cv00134
Petitioner:
Aaron Winder
Respondent:
Warden Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Winder v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv02420
Petitioner:
Aaron Winder
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
