Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-4528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
APPLETON MEDICAL CENTER et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2010cv01498
Plaintiff:
APPLETON MEDICAL CENTER , ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL, INC. , BALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Wishard v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv12177
Plaintiff:
Sara Wishard
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. WISHARD et al
as 2:2010cv04179
Defendant:
JEFF WISHARD, MIKE CORWIN, Angela Wasson-Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MOORE v. VILLAVICENCIO et al
as 1:2010cv00840
Defendant:
CLARION HEALTH METHODIST, RAQUEL VILLAVICENCIO and WISHARD ADVANTAGE
Plaintiff:
KEITH MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JAMES v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv01204
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. JAMES
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., JEFFREY WRIGLES, CMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Julius Johnson, Jr. v. Wishard Hand Malpractice
as 09-1340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIUS JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WISHARD HAND MALPRACTICE, $45,000,000 O.B.O.
Julius Johnson, Jr. v. Wishard Knee Malpractice
as 08-3875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIUS JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WISHARD KNEE MALPRACTICE, $5,000,000 OBO
Monahan et al v. Emerald Performance Materials LLC
as 2:2008cv01511
Plaintiff:
Miles Monahan, Dale Housden, David Roberts and others
Defendant:
Emerald Performance Materials LLC, Emerald Performance Materials LLC and Emerald Performance Materials LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
