Cases 1 - 10 of 1,169
Misanin et al v. Wilson et al
as 2:2024cv04734
Defendant:
William H. Bingham, Sr., South Carolina Public Employee Benefit Authority, Thomas L. Stephenson and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy Noe, Grant Goe, Nina Noe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WITHERSPOON v. JOSEPH GIGLIOTTI et al
as 2:2024cv03333
Defendant:
PHILLYWIDE WASTE REMOVAL, INC. and JOSEPH GIGLIOTTI doing business as PHILLYWIDE DISPOSAL
Plaintiff:
KAH-LIL WITHERSPOON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WITHERSPOON v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv02761
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JAMALL A. WITHERSPOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Witherspoon v. Warden, Ronald S. Weber
as 1:2024cv01551
Respondent:
Warden, Ronald S. Weber
Petitioner:
Edward Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joiner et al v. Hirschbach Motor Lines Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00697
Defendant:
Hirschbach Motor Lines Inc and Jessie Ladale Witherspoon
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Joiner and Cordell Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Witherspoon v. Weber
as 1:2024cv01084
Petitioner:
Edward Witherspoon
Respondent:
Warden Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Qsar et al
as 3:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Jordan Qsar, Grant Witherspoon, Austin Bernard and others
WITHERSPOON v. USA
as 2:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
CAMEO WITHERSPOON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
