Cases 1 - 10 of 399
Jones v. Heuer
as 24-50348
Plaintiff:
William Curtis Jones
Defendant:
Lon Heuer, with the Jefferson County District Attorney's Office, Charles Keith Hawkes, with the Jefferson County District Attorney's Office, Quentin Price, with the Jefferson County District Attorney's Office and others
Tolliver (PS) v. Priest et al
as 1:2024cv01245
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Priest, Victim Witness, Chruch Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arcona v. Camden County Drug Court et al
as 1:2024cv05644
Plaintiff:
DANIEL AZCONA
Defendant:
Camden County Drug Court, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT., N/DOC Staff Male and Female and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arcona v. Camden County Druo Court et al
as 1:2024cv02481
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arcona
Defendant:
Camden County Druo Court, New Brunswick Police Dept., N/DOC Staff Male and Female and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Wits End of Twinsburg, LLC et al.
as 5:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Christian Harris
Defendant:
Wits End of Twinsburg, LLC doing business as Brewsters Cafe Bistro Pub, Scott B Rafuse and Colin Rafuse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Fox #425694 et al v. Heeke et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Ray Earnest Fox #425694
Defendant:
Unknown Heeke, Unknown Miracles, Unknown Haug and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United Behavioral Health v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 24-242
Petitioner:
UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Not Classified By Court:
DAVID WIT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, NATASHA WIT, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, BRIAN MUIR, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
