Cases 1 - 10 of 176
Woolf v. Mclain et al
as 2:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
DJulino Exulus Woolf
Defendant:
Patrick Mclain, Reginal Counsel Office, Lee County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Radtke et al
as 2:2023cv01408
Plaintiff:
Kevin O Harper
Defendant:
Dylon Radtke, Michelle Haese, John Kind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woolf v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
as 5:2023cv00612
Petitioner:
James Woolf
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woolf et al v. Precision Technologies LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
Vadim Woolf and Helena Woolf
Defendant:
Precision Technologies LLC and JTEKT North America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Nixon v. Woolf et al
as 1:2023cv02349
Counter Defendant:
Rosemarie G Nixon
Cross Defendant:
Nicole Woolf
Cross Claimant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - E.R.I.S.A. Employee Benefits
Woolf v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Carla Woolf
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Woolf v. Vantage Travel Services, Inc.,
as 1:2023cv11260
Plaintiff:
Annette Woolf
Defendant:
Vantage Travel Services, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Woolf v Vantage Travel Service, Inc.,
as 1:2023cv11261
Plaintiff:
Annette Woolf
Defendant:
Vantage Travel Services, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Talley v. Talley et al
as 2:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
William Michael Talley
Defendant:
Michael Blake Talley, Tracy Elizabeth Talley and Kenneth Ray Woolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremiah Moore v. District Attorney Montgomery County, et al
as 22-2642
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMIAH MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY, KEVIN R. STEELE, RICHARD H. BRADBURY, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
