Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Strong v. YouTube(GOOGLE LLC)
as 1:2024cv11033
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Strong
Defendant:
YouTube(GOOGLE LLC)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Zorilla v. Youtube et al
as 1:2024cv02487
Plaintiff:
Henry Zorilla
Defendant:
Youtube and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. YouTube, LLC
as 0:2024cv60441
Plaintiff:
Mr. Chris E Smith
Defendant:
YouTube, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Libel, Assault, Slander
SELLERS v. YOUTUBE LLC
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
TYQASHIA SELLERS
Defendant:
YOUTUBE LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNeal v. Calvin et al
as 4:2023cv01732
Plaintiff:
Syreeta LaShawn McNeal, Esq.
Defendant:
Vera L. Calvin, Anthony T. Lofties, Joann A. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Montano v. Washington State Department of Health et al
as 1:2023cv23903
Plaintiff:
Dr. Sandy Montano
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Health, Washington State Spokane County, Washington State Spokane County, Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hooper v. Hogue et al
as 5:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Demetric Lemond Hooper
Defendant:
Tiana Lorissa Robinson-Hogue, Oklahoma City Police Department, BioLife Plasma Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard Jackson et al v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv09438
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JACKSON, JULIE BRIGGS and GREGG BUCHWALTER
Defendant:
TWITTER, INC., GOOGLE, LLC, ALPHABET, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valmiki Ramani v. YouTube, LLC
as 23-16201
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALMIKI D. RAMANI
Defendant / Appellee:
YOUTUBE, LLC
Jones v. Alphabet Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01292
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc, Google Inc, David Tepper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
