Cases 1 - 10 of 10
RIGGS et al v. Bartlett, City of, Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv02780
Plaintiff:
MR. DONALD RIGGS and CHRISTY RIGGS
Defendant:
Bartlett, City of, Tennessee, BENJAMIN ARMSTRONG, ZACHARY MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedures Act
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC v. MARTIN et al
as 3:2021cv00647
Defendant:
BRETT SCHARF, ARTHUR MARTIN, WADE MARTIN and others
Plaintiff:
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv39374
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY MARTIN YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Zachary Cymbalak
as 19-3773
Defendant / Appellant:
ZACHARY MARTIN CYMBALAK
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01388
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Cosby v. First Tennessee (Bank) National Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04291
Plaintiff:
Anqous R. Cosby
Defendant:
First Tennessee (Bank) National Association, Inc., First Horizon (Bank) National Corporation, Charles Burkett and others
Krzykwa v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00337
Plaintiff:
Zachary Martin Krzykwa
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cosby v. First Tennesse Bank National Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03357
Plaintiff:
Anqous R. Cosby
Defendant:
First Tennesse Bank National Association, Inc., First Horizon Bank National Corporation Inc., Charles Burkett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Martin v. Coulter
as 1:2008cv02554
Plaintiff:
Zachary Martin
Defendant:
Brain Coulter
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
