Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Daniels v. Blair et al
as 3:2012cv00150
Plaintiff:
Marcus L Daniels
Defendant:
Blair, Zane Boyd, Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Fitzgerald v. Teresa Bonner, et al
as 11-2479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nathaniel Fitzgerald
Defendant - Appellee:
Teresa Bonner, Chief Jailer, Crittenden County Detention Center, Richard Busby, Sheriff, Crittenden County Detention Center, Zane Boyd, Administrator, Crittenden County Detention Center and others
Mangum v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 3:2011cv00047
Plaintiff:
Randy Mangum
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Crittenden County, Arkansas, Crittenden County Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stinnett et al v. Busby et al
as 3:2010cv00244
Plaintiff:
Melvin Stinnett and Herbert Holmes
Defendant:
Richard Busby, Zane Boyd and Theresa Bonner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesby et al v. Boyd et al
as 3:2010cv00197
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nesby and Rodrigues Jones
Defendant:
Zane Boyd, Teresa Bonner, Linsey Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Busby et al
as 3:2010cv00177
Plaintiff:
Rickey Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Dick Busby, Zane Boyd, Tereasa Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry et al v. Busby et al
as 3:2010cv00097
Plaintiff:
Eric D Perry and Maurio Heron
Defendant:
Dick Busby, Thereasa Bonner, Zane Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall et al v. Busby et al
as 3:2010cv00082
Plaintiff:
Ted Hall, Sydney Tate and Herbert Holmes
Defendant:
Richard Busby, Terresa Bonner, Zane Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitzgerald v. Bonner et al
as 3:2010cv00078
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Teressa Bonner, Busby, Zane Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
