Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jeffrey Mitchell v. Lt. Cooke
as 26-6795
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JAMEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
LT. COOKE, OFFICER MUNCY, OFFICER RYAN EDWARDS and others
Terry Ofori v. C. Long
as 26-6777
Plaintiff:
TERRY K. OFORI
Defendant:
C. LONG, M. D. POWERS, MR. RUTLEDGE and others
Lein v. Steiner et al
as 6:2026cv01021
Plaintiff:
Barry Lein
Defendant:
Linda Steiner, Catherine M. Gaskin, Regele Law LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Elvis Rusnak, et al v. USA, et al
as 26-5171
Plaintiff:
Elvis Rusnak and Clayton Omar Zook
Defendant:
United States of America, Comptroller General of the United States, in his official capacity, Special Master, U.S. Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Fund, in her official capacity and others
Terry Ofori v. Carl Manis
as 26-6569
Plaintiff:
TERRY K. OFORI
Defendant:
CARL A. MANIS, MELVIN C. DAVIS, JEFFERY ARTRIP and others
FESS v. FESS'S AUTO, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv00482
Plaintiff:
KAYLA FESS
Defendant:
AMMON ZOOK and FESS'S AUTO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ZOOK v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv02287
Plaintiff:
KATRINA ZOOK
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
David Meyers v. Thomas Meyer
as 26-6320
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
THOMAS MEYER, V.A.D.O.C. Western Regional Administrator, CATHY MEADE, V.A.D.O.C. Western Regional Ombudsman, MR. R. BIVENS and others
David Meyers v. Michael Pozeg
as 26-6326
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MICHAEL POZEG, WRSP Cheif of Housing and Programs, DAVID ROSE, The WRSP-A.D.A- Coordinator and Operations Manager, DAVID ZOOK, WRSP Chief Warden and others
David Meyers v. Samuel Caughron
as 26-6321
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
SAMUEL CAUGHRON, W.R.S.P. Unit Manager, MICHAEL POZEG, J. ARTRIP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
