Cases 1 - 10 of 18,256
CORPUZ v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ULANDAY CORPUZ
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Andrion v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 8:2024cv01382
Plaintiff:
Albert Andrion
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tapia v. Msp. Trooper D et al
as 1:2024cv01639
Defendant:
G.T.L., Msp. Trooper D, Sgt. Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Tapia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Reger v. Beason et al
as 1:2024cv04624
Plaintiff:
Christopher Reger
Defendant:
Albert Beason and Magnum, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Walker v. Adams et al
as 5:2024cv03314
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Walker and Jeffrey Walker
Defendant:
Chief Adams, Sgt. Callaway, Lt. Clasal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARAIZA et al v. Chiquita Canyon, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv04600
Plaintiff:
SERENITY ARAIZA, RICHARD SAMUELSON, ASHLEY TURNER and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Canyon, LLC, Waste Connections Management Services, Inc. and Waste Connections US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
William Abner v. US
as 24-1492
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ABNER, SHANE BOGGS, PATRICK BOWLING and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hicks v. Van Houten
as 1:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Albert Himer Hicks, Jr
Defendant:
Margaret M. Van Houten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
