Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Rutledge et al v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R and A D R
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lackey v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv01259
Petitioner:
James E. Lackey
Respondent:
Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lackey v. Unnamed
as 1:2024cv01123
Petitioner:
James Edward Lackey, Jr.
Respondent:
Unnamed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ISHMAN v. SLOCUMB et al
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY W. ISHMAN
Defendant:
OFFICER SLOCUMB, LIEUTENANT THOMPSON, CAPTAIN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ishman v. Slocumb et al
as 5:2024ct03055
Plaintiff:
Bradley W. Ishman
Defendant:
Officer Slocumb, Lieutenant Thompson, Captain Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobbler v. Lackey
as 5:2023ct03303
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Marie Cobbler
Defendant:
Officer Lackey and Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2023cv17721
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elzey v. Huntington County et al
as 1:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Kortney Lee Elzey
Defendant:
Huntington County, Indiana State of, Jennifer Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lackey v. USA
as 1:2023cv00726
Petitioner:
Maurice Lackey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walton v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Romaris Walton
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Lorie Cunningham, Luking and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
