Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Woodington v. Barren et al
as 1:2019cv00764
Defendant:
Sgt. Williams, Joe Barren, Corp Shildt and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Alan Woodington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. St. Paul Travelers Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01454
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Counselor Kessel, Nurse Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. SAINT PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANY INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00598
Defendant:
BOB STELLER, MOBILE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INC., EDDIE CURRAN and others
Plaintiff:
EDMOND HUDMOND SMITH, IV and LOUIS HOLGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lackey v. Indiana Parole Board et al
as 3:2018cv00892
Plaintiff:
Marshall Lackey, II
Defendant:
John Doe and Indiana Parole Board
Undetermined:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv01390
Defendant:
C.O. STEFFIN, SGT. CHESMER, LT. JELLOT and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Finch v. Martin et al
as 2:2018cv00101
Plaintiff:
Drake Jordan Finch
Defendant:
NFN Martin, Blake Lackey, Crystal Rust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. James Lackey
as 18-55576
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES A. LACKEY
WASHINGTON v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00338
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GILMORE, LACKEY and CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Washington et al
as 5:2018cv00035
Defendant:
Major FNU Castleberry, Monica Delavasco, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Baez Cruz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2017cv01544
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SMITH
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, MARK DIALESSANDRO, DSCS, ADAM SEDLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
