Cases 1 - 10 of 643
Martin v. Putman et al
as 3:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Erwin D. Martin
Defendant:
Eric Putman, f/n/u Allen, Michael Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Pelzer et al
as 5:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Donderrious Williams
Defendant:
Jeremy Pelzer, Michael Jones, Steven Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. The City of New York
as 24-1388
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JONES
Respondent:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, BILL DE BLASIO, Former Mayor of New York City, ERIC GONZALEZ, Kings County District Attorney and others
Jones, Brent M. v. Yarusso et al
as 1:2024cv21958
Plaintiff:
Brent Michael Jones and Brent Micheal Jones
Defendant:
A. Yarusso, H. Fitoria, B. Campos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BALDWIN KRYSTYN SHERMAN PARTNERS, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03852
Plaintiff:
BALDWIN KRYSTYN SHERMAN PARTNERS, LLC and THE BALDWIN GROUP COLLEAGUE, INC.
Defendant:
Michael Jones
Jones v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00338
Defendant:
Katie, Warden, Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
David Michael Jones
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rupp, et al. v. Bonta
as 24-2583
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RUPP, STEVEN DEMBER, CHERYL JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Omar et al (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Ellu M. Omar, Demetrius M. Wallace, Jerren R. Pack and others
Defendant:
Diggins, Line, Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
WARDEN, BENNETT, OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
James Hines
Defendant:
Michael Jones and John and Jane Doe(s) I-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
