Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Washington v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
DeLarron Keith Washington
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Jimmy Coleman, IV, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Test v. Test
as 1:2023cv33333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff Test
Defendant:
Defendant Michael Test
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bektas v. Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
Haydar Bektas
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety, Angela McCracken, Transportation Innovation Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DOE TEST v. WARDEN SCI PHOENIX
as 2:2023cv99994
Plaintiff:
RAY DOE TEST
Defendant:
WARDEN SCI PHOENIX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE TEST v. WARDEN SCI WAYMART TEST
as 2:2023cv99989
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DOE TEST
Defendant:
WARDEN SCI WAYMART TEST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv99992
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DOE TEST v. UNITED STAT0ES OF AMERICA TEST
as 2:2023cv99993
Plaintiff:
DAN DOE TEST
Defendant:
UNITED STAT0ES OF AMERICA TEST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE TEST v. SCI PHOENIX et al
as 2:2023cv99991
Petitioner:
JANE DOE TEST
Respondent:
SCI PHOENIX and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA TEST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
DOE TEST v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY TEST
as 2:2023cv99990
Petitioner:
JOHN DOE TEST
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY TEST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Anamosa State Penitentiary
as 1:2023af08888
Petitioner:
Test Smith
Respondent:
Anamosa State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
