Cases 31 - 40 of 265
Washington v. Streeval et al
as 7:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
Daryl Vincent Xzavier Washington and Darryl Washington
Defendant:
J. C. Streeval, Ledford, Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brizuela v. USP Hazelton
as 1:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Felix Brizuela
Defendant:
USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Banks v. USP Lee
as 7:2022cv00516
Petitioner:
Johnnie Edwards Banks, Jr.
Respondent:
USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James v. USP Lee Warden
as 7:2022cv00512
Petitioner:
Calvin James
Respondent:
USP Lee Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Copeland v. USP Lee
as 7:2022cv00499
Petitioner:
Kenneth Dewayne Copeland and Kent D. Copeland
Respondent:
Warden USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cofield et al v. The Corporation Trust, Inc. Passport Motors Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01989
Plaintiff:
Keenan Cofield and Laverne Thompson
Defendant:
THE CORPORATION TRUST, INC. PASSPORT MOTORS HOLDINGS, INC., PASSPORT MOTORS HOLDINGS, INC., PASSPORT NISSAN OF MARLOW HEIGHTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams
as 22-6875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN JANE OR JOHN DOE, Director, IRS Department of the Treasury, WILLIAMS, Reck Officer, FCI Beckley, FORREN, Lieutenant, FCI Beckley and others
JACKSON v. COLEMAN USP 1
as 1:2022cv00554
Plaintiff:
PATRICK JACKSON
Defendant:
COLEMAN USP 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Phillip Neal v. Warden, USP Lee
as 22-6777
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILLIP LENARD NEAL
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, USP LEE
Crawford v. USP Hazelton
as 5:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Shakeem Crawford
Defendant:
USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
