Cases 41 - 50 of 16,115
Ray et al v. McZeal et al
as 3:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Cierra Ray and Luxe II Realty Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Alfred McZeal and Houston Real Estate Business
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Shields v. City of Houston
as 4:2024cv01291
Plaintiff:
Tye Shields
Defendant:
City of Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weiss v. Diamondback Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02689
Plaintiff:
Steven Weiss
Defendant:
Diamondback Energy, Inc., Travis D. Stice, Vincent K. Brooks and others
Payne v. City of Houston, Texas
as 24-20150
Plaintiff:
Harriet Payne, Charles Payne, Jr., Cavin Payne and others
Defendant:
City of Houston, Texas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Houston v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
Polica Houston
Defendant:
Damon (I) Smith, Damon Smith, Carole (I) Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Ralston v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv05082
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wayne Ralston
Defendant:
Judge Casey Jones, Judge Mark Lindsay, Corey Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartek v. Retina Consultants of Houston, PLLC
as 4:2024cv01272
Plaintiff:
Stuart Bartek
Defendant:
Retina Consultants of Houston, PLLC doing business as Retina Consultants of Texas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Conrriquez v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
Monica Conrriquez
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 oc Notice of Removal - Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
