Civilian Pay, Back Pay Cases filed in West Virginia matching "S"
Cases 61 - 70 of 827,369
Whybark v. Whalen et al
as 2:2024cv00692
Plaintiff: Marcus Whybark
Defendant: Carl D. Whalen and Kenneth P. Fredericksen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McColl v. State of Washington
as 2:2024cv00688
Petitioner: James John McColl
Respondent: State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farm Credit of The Virginias, ACA v. Depoy
as 2:2024cv00006
Plaintiff: Farm Credit of The Virginias, ACA
Defendant: Walter Kim Depoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024bk07484
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amado v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2024at00405
Plaintiff: Sarah Irene Amado
Defendant: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Kacy Lelievre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Andris
as 2:2024mc50494
Defenders of Wildlife et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff: Defenders of Wildlife and Sierra Club
Defendant: United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams, Michael Oetker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Calhoun v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02630
Plaintiff: Andrew Calhoun
Defendant: Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gisclair v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01298
Plaintiff: Jamie Gisclair
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Interested Party: U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Louisiana -SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Salyers v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02614
Plaintiff: Sarah Salyers
Defendant: Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?