Cases 101 - 110 of 827,218
McKinnon v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02545
Plaintiff:
Ralph McKinnon
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Medeiros v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02546
Plaintiff:
Maria Medeiros
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jacka v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02539
Plaintiff:
James Jacka
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DeBritto v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2024cv00201
Petitioner:
Timothy DeBritto
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island and R.I. Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Magness v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01107
Plaintiff:
Heather Magness
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Perrier v. Ortiz et al
as 2:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Mr. Felipe Anthony Perrier
Defendant:
Mauro Esteban Ortiz and Piedra Transport, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Motedata Inc. v. Track What Matters, L.L.C.
as 2:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Motedata Inc.
Defendant:
Track What Matters, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Corbett v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Leslie Corbett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muneer v. Seaworld Parks & Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Monsen Muneer
Defendant:
Seaworld Parks & Entertainment, Inc., Doe 1 (Manager) and Does 1 to 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
