Cases 111 - 120 of 825,915
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Collins v. Veach et al
as 3:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
Billy L. Collins
Defendant:
Veach, C. York, J. Marfil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WESLEY v. PAYNE et al
as 5:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALLEN WESLEY, JR
Defendant:
S PAYNE and C WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THE PHILADELPHIA REGIONAL PORT AUTHORITY v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 2:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
THE PHILADELPHIA REGIONAL PORT AUTHORITY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, DISTRICT COMMANDER FOR THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JEFFREY BEEMAN, CHIEF OF THE REGULATORY BRANCH FOR THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, TODD A. SCHAIBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garcia v. Unknown Staff
as 24-40318
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Unknown Staff, Director FNU Parker, U S Government and others
K.O. v. Red Lion Hotels Corporation, et al
as 24-1395
Plaintiff:
K.O., An Individual
Defendant:
RED LION HOTELS CORPORATION, et al., G6 HOSPITALITY, LLC, MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
United States v. Franklin
as 24-3066
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MAURICE FRANKLIN, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024bk12007
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
