Cases 1 - 10 of 826,377
Schill et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02345
Plaintiff:
Robin S. Schill and Monique Schill
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LIA Network v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
LIA Network
Defendant:
J.R. Johnson, Randall H. Erben, Chris Flood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McPherson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Monte McPherson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Ford v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Erica Ford
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024bk71812
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Parker v. Conduent HR Services, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02821
Plaintiff:
Philip Parker
Defendant:
Conduent HR Services, LLC and Conduent Business Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Dolls Kill, Inc. v. RebelsMarket, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02818
Plaintiff:
Dolls Kill, Inc.
Defendant:
RebelsMarket, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Woolard v. The Glad Products Company et al
as 3:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Craig Woolard
Defendant:
The Glad Products Company and The Clorox Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Medina v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Tina Medina
Defendant:
Judge Laura H. Miller, Judge Maureen H. Hallahan, Judge Jose S. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
