Cases 11 - 20 of 1,761
TOUSSAINT v. CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICE
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
FRITZ GERALD TOUSSAINT
Defendant:
CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TOUSSAINT v. CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICE
as 2:2023cv05200
Plaintiff:
FRITZ GERALD TOUSSAINT
Defendant:
CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ross v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
as 23-7861
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIELLE ROSS
Defendant / Appellee:
CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC
Huntington National Bank v. Cavalry LLC et al
as 0:2023cv03593
Plaintiff:
Huntington National Bank
Defendant:
Cavalry LLC doing business as CNC Property Management LLC and Yoel Bochner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee of the Bungalow Series IV Trust v. Diorio et al
as 1:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee of the Bungalow Series IV Trust
Defendant:
Michael J Diorio, Christine L Diorio and Cavalry Portfolio Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
