Cases 81 - 90 of 4,556
(DP) Vieira v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2023cv01085
Petitioner:
Richard John Vieira
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Mark Bradford v. Ron Broomfield
as 23-99005
Petitioner:
MARK ALAN BRADFORD
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden
Ellis v Jeffreys
as 8:2023cv00315
Petitioner:
Roy L. Ellis
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Vasquez v. Collier
as 2:2023cv00168
Petitioner:
Richard Vasquez, Jr.
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Death Penalty)
Milton Taylor v. Commissioner Delaware Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-2160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MILTON TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Hall v. Richardson
as 1:2023cv00335
Petitioner:
Erick Virgil Hall
Respondent:
Tim Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Cannon v. State of Oklahoma, The
as 4:2023cv00293
Petitioner:
Jemaine Monteil Cannon
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Johnson v. Vandergriff
as 4:2023cv00845
Petitioner:
Johnny A. Johnson
Respondent:
Warden David Vandergriff and David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 23-70002
Petitioner:
Dexter Johnson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Barber v. Ivey et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
James Edward Barber
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm, Terry Raybon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
