Cases 11 - 20 of 368
International Code Council, Inc. et al v. Upcodes, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06261
Plaintiff:
International Code Council, Inc. and American Society of Civil Engineers
Defendant:
Upcodes, Inc., Garrett Reynolds and Scott Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Alfonso Ribeiro v. Epic Games, Inc.
as 2:2018cv10412
Defendant:
Epic Games, Inc. and Does 1-50, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Ribeiro
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Conan Properties International LLC v. ARH Studios, Inc.
as 2:2016cv05284
Defendant:
ARH Studios, Inc.
Unknown:
Stephen Douglas Collins
Plaintiff:
Conan Properties International LLC
PUBG Corporation et al v. NetEase, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv02010
Plaintiff:
PUBG Corporation and PUBG Santa Monica, Inc.
Defendant:
NetEase, Inc., NetEase Information Technology Corporation and NetEase (Hong Kong) Limited
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Goldman v. Breitbart News Network LLC et al.
as 1:2017cv03144
Plaintiff:
Justin Goldman
Defendant:
Breitbart News Network LLC , Heavy, Inc. , Time Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Wexler v. Internet Brands, Inc.
as 1:2017cv06898
Plaintiff:
David Wexler
Defendant:
Internet Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Epic Games, Inc. v. Rogers
as 5:2017cv00534
Plaintiff:
Epic Games, Inc.
Defendant:
Caleb Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Epic Games, Inc. v. Foret
as 5:2017cv00554
Plaintiff:
Epic Games, Inc.
Defendant:
Mason Foret
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Epic Games, Inc. et al v. Josefsson et al
as 3:2017cv05961
Plaintiff:
Epic Games, Inc. and Epic Games International S.A.R.L.
Defendant:
Philip Josefsson and Artem Yakovenko
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Epic Games, Inc. et al v. Mendes et al
as 3:2017cv06223
Plaintiff:
Epic Games, Inc. and Epic Games International S.A.R.L.
Defendant:
James Mendes, Konstantin Vladimirovich Rak and Olekseevich Stegailo
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
