Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 61 - 70 of 417,149
Johnson v. Hill et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00743
Petitioner: Thomas Johnson
Respondent: James Hill and R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz, Francisco v. Yermish et al
as 1:2024cv21549
Plaintiff: Francisco Rodriguez Cruz and Francisco Rodriguez-Cruz
Defendant: Steven Yermish and Martin Public Defender Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirkland, Timothy v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv21543
Plaintiff: Timothy M. Kirkland
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Josephsson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange)
as 6:2024cv00759
Petitioner: Gangleri Josephsson
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Warden of SCI-Mahanoy et al
as 2:2024cv01716
Petitioner: WALLACE JONES
Respondent: Warden of SCI-Mahanoy and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell Grimes v. State of Delaware, et al
as 24-1744
Plaintiff: RUSSELL M. GRIMES
Defendant: STATE OF DELAWARE and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Larry Blakney v. Merrick Garland
as 24-6377
Petitioner: LARRY BLAKNEY
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of U.S. and WARDEN THOMAS SCARANTINO
Ronald Sutherland, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6378
Petitioner: RONALD KEITH SUTHERLAND, JR.
Respondent: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and WARDEN
Roberto Lopez v. Lizzie Tegels
as 24-1672
Petitioner: ROBERTO I. LOPEZ
Respondent: LIZZIE TEGELS, Warden
David Ross v. Chris Buesgen
as 24-1676
Petitioner: DAVID W. ROSS
Respondent: CHRIS S. BUESGEN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?