Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 417,520
Swanson v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01176
Petitioner:
Benjamin Godwin Swanson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carpenter v. King et al
as 1:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
Carli Carpenter
Respondent:
Chris King, Kym Worthy, Patricia Penman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yung v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03304
Petitioner:
John Yung
Respondent:
N.Y.C Mayor Adams, Warden and Commissioner of NYC Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tassone v. D'Varga et al
as 2:2024cv02123
Plaintiff:
Matthew Tassone
Defendant:
Judge Jessica G D'Varga and Judge James Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
NELSON v. WARDLOW
as 4:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
BILLY JOE NELSON
Respondent:
JERRY WARDLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01681
Petitioner:
DLance Chazion Anderson
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Holpzapfell
as 5:2024cv00229
Petitioner:
Stye Lamar Coleman
Respondent:
Holpzapfell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Buggs v. Leslie et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00270
Defendant:
Donna Leslie, Montgomery Area Mental Health Authority and Steve Marshall
Plaintiff:
Dynassus Buggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dailey v. TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
Anthony Ray Dailey
Respondent:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Carter v. Huhn
as 4:2024cv00630
Petitioner:
William Billy G. Carter
Respondent:
Valerie Huhn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
