Cases 11 - 20 of 240,917
United States of America v. Top Tier Remodeling Corporation
as 1:2024cv04897
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Top Tier Remodeling Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Watson et al v. Thor Motor Coach
as 3:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Watson and Mary E. Watson
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
In Re Attorney Admission for Blaine Franklin Burgess
as 5:2024aa00065
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney Admission Application
New S.S. Group, Inc. et al v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv11542
Plaintiff:
New S.S. Group, Inc. a Massachusetts Corporation doing business as S S Market #1, Shilpi Rani Devi and Sumon Kumar Nath
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Dorcely
as 0:2024cv02264
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Kendrick Dorcely
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Habhegger et al v. City of Duluth Comfort Systems
as 0:2024cv02265
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Habhegger and Andrew Habhegger
Defendant:
City of Duluth Comfort Systems
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 0524 Bankruptcy: Effect of Discharge
T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC v. BOROUGH OF WANAQUE et al
as 2:2024cv07001
Plaintiff:
T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF WANAQUE and BOROUGH OF WANAQUE PLANNING BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Santana v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC.
as 2:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Santana
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Word et al v. U.S. Department of Energy
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Bill Word and David Daquin
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Energy
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
