Fourth Circuit Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 521,619
Vang v. Valdese Weaver et al
as 1:2022cv00119
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
IN RE: Graciano Soto Solis El
as 1:2022mc00018
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
NG et al v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv01947
Plaintiff:
GET NG and PETER NG
Defendant:
Cincinnati Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Sanders v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.
as 8:2022cv01944
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sanders
Defendant:
Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Sanders v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.
as 8:2022cv01945
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sanders
Defendant:
Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hawthorne Industrial Products Inc. v. M/V Indigo Spica (IMO No. 9708758) et al
as 1:2022cv01946
Plaintiff:
Hawthorne Industrial Products Inc.
Defendant:
M/V Indigo Spica (IMO No. 9708758), IMS Maritime SA, IMECS Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Gemmill v. Riccio
as 1:2022cv01954
Plaintiff:
Lindsey C Gemmill
Defendant:
Robert J. Riccio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
The Nedi Irrevocable Trust v. A&E Logistics Management, LLC
as 1:2022cv01957
Plaintiff:
The Nedi Irrevocable Trust
Defendant:
A&E Logistics Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Silva v. Baltimore Waterproofing, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01943
Plaintiff:
Peter Silva
Defendant:
Baltimore Waterproofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 a Immigration: Judicial Review for Battered Spouses; Deportation (INS)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
