Fourth Circuit Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 563,505
Carberry v. Darlington County School district Represented et al
as 0:2024cv01991
Plaintiff:
Alexis Carberry
Defendant:
Darlington County School district Represented, Tim Newman, Carla Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conkwright v. Forefront Dermatology, S.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Caroline Conkwright
Defendant:
Forefront Dermatology, S.C. and Forefront Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
CzechPoint, Inc. v. Southern Tactical, LLC
as 3:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
CzechPoint, Inc.
Defendant:
Southern Tactical, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
United States of America v. J.D. Coleson
as 2:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
J.D. Coleson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Sterling v. Puryear
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Wesley Sterling
Defendant:
T. Puryear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Chesapeake Bank v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Bank
Defendant:
Stella Gale Jones, Perfect Touch Innovations, LLC and Valley Communities Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
