Seventh Circuit Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 474,565
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Armour v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00356
Petitioner:
Rickey R Armour
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Morales
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Billy Williams
Defendant:
Morales
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $106,503.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$106,503.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
DEVINE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. DEVINE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Waldorf v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Tim Waldorf
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sheppard v. Matushak et al
as 2:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Sheppard and Antonio Decarlo Sheppard, Jr
Defendant:
Lt Anthony Matushak, Jody Perttu, CO Mayor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Tritt et al
as 2:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Brandon Bradley, Sr
Defendant:
Kyle Tritt, Joseph Beahm, Jesse Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Nantomah et al
as 2:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Tomas Matos and Jeannie Berry-Matos
Defendant:
Joseph Nantomah, Onyeka Nantomah and Investors Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
