Eighth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 73,755
Crawford v. Hall County Sheriff Dept et al
as 8:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Charles Crawford
Defendant:
Hall County Sheriff Dept and Deputy Draper Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. USA
as 8:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
Lonnie L. Perry
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wright v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv02023
Petitioner:
David Wright, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pratt v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Charlie Phillips and Sheriff Ricky Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. United States of America Federal Government Official Officer, Agents et al
as 8:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Kariem Qaadir Muhammad
Defendant:
United States of America Federal Government Official Officer, Agents, The City of Denver and The City of Aurora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoulders v. Hardy et al
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Roderick Davontae Shoulders
Defendant:
Hardy, Harmon, Musselwhite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wirth et al v. Burton et al
as 0:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Donald Joseph Wirth, Jr and Nicholas Thomas Stroeder
Defendant:
James Julis Burton, Jane Doe Number 1, Jane Doe Number 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Conrad v. United States
as 24-1933
Petitioner:
William Desmond Conrad
Respondent:
United States of America
Bernard Manuel v. United States
as 24-1938
Other:
Bernard Manuel
Respondent:
United States of America
Ryan Haynes v. United States
as 24-1939
Petitioner:
Ryan Nicholas Haynes
Respondent:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
