Ninth Circuit Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,121,692
Gesell v. Cottonwood, City of et al
as 3:2024cv08090
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gesell
Defendant:
Cottonwood, City of, Tim Elinski, Jesus Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Skillicorn v. Dickey et al
as 2:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
Allen Skillicorn
Defendant:
Ginny Dickey, Brenda J Kalivianakis, Sharron Grzybowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Campbell v. CoreCivic
as 2:2024cv01073
Plaintiff:
Kevin Campbell
Defendant:
CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans #078208 v. Thornhill-Garrison et al
as 2:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Ira Deland Evans
Defendant:
Julynne Thornhill-Garrison, Eve Kelemen and Unknown Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Tee v. Shea et al
as 4:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Ignatius M Tee, Jr.
Defendant:
Shannon M Shea and Carlos Del Toro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Morilha v. Alphabet Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv02793
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vitor Morilha
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google LLC, Facebook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ABPIKAR v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 5:2024cv02836
Plaintiff:
HASSAN ABPIKAR
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Charles W. Scharf and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
