Cases 61 - 70 of 384,105
Eagle v. City of Escondido et al
as 3:2024cv01083
Plaintiff:
Carlos White Eagle
Defendant:
City of Escondido, Escondido Police Department, Officer Adrian Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rhear et al v. Does
as 4:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Rose Rhear, Tabatha Moffatt, Tonya Hughes and others
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARG v. SLALOM INC. et al
as 3:2024cv07156
Plaintiff:
SIDDHARTH "SID" GARG
Defendant:
SLALOM INC. doing business as SLALOM CONSULTING, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 and ABC CORP. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Santa Ana Pacific Associates v. Ahmad Ayubi et al
as 8:2024cv01378
Plaintiff:
Santa Ana Pacific Associates
Defendant:
Ahmad Ayubi, Johnny Miller and Does 1 to 10 inclusive
Stebbins v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv03727
Plaintiff:
David A. Stebbins
Defendant:
John Doe and YouTube, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Rubin Lublin TN PLLC v. Greenberg et al
as 3:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
Rubin Lublin TN PLLC
Defendant:
Daniel S. Greenberg, Carla D. Gifford, Estate of Marian Wise and others
Cross Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Davidson County Tennessee, Williamson County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Real Property
Uncel, Jr. v. Ponomarev et al
as 4:2024cv04065
Plaintiff:
Bobby Uncel, Jr.
Defendant:
Eduard Ponomarev and John Does I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Vetnique Labs LLC v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2024cv05199
Plaintiff:
Vetnique Labs LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Ramirez and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
