Cases 81 - 90 of 13,838
Subasic v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Slobodan Subasic
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, Oregon Department of Administrative Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Coons v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Steven Coons
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpler v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02071
Petitioner:
Jimmy Edward Simpler
Respondent:
David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mulder v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02070
Petitioner:
William Brian Mulder
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
KENDRICK v. WHISTLER et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Defendant:
RICHARD OLETO CHANG, DARLA KAY WHISTLER, JUSTIN AUSTIN TORRES and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LAMONT KENDRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prisco v. Moss et al
as 3:2024cv05236
Plaintiff:
Andy Prisco
Defendant:
Laura Moss, Rich Pfeiffer, Growth Central Training LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Rich v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Prince Edward Rich, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Trenkler v. Bowers
as 1:2024cv10780
Petitioner:
Alfred Trenkler
Respondent:
Warden David Rich and Warden Freddie Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bridges v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
David Bridges
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contractors Steel Company v. Fleming Steel Company
as 4:2024cv10756
Plaintiff:
Contractors Steel Company
Defendant:
Fleming Steel Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
