Land Condemnation Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 6,139
Right Angle Ventures LLC v. The People of the State of California et al
as 2:2024cv02785
Plaintiff: Right Angle Ventures LLC
Defendant: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the Department of Transportation and 1-10 DOES
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 946 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. 3.02 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: NW/4 et al
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff: WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Defendant: 3.02 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: NW/4, 2.92 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: N/2SW/4, 1.45 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: S/2SW/4 with exception and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. 189.9 rods in Twsp. 149, et al
as 24-1693
Plaintiff: WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Defendant: 189.9 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 11: W1/2SE1/4 Section 14: NW1/4NE1/4 McKenzie County, North Dakota, An easement and right-of-way across, 227.8 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 11: N1/2SW1/4, W1/2SE1/4, McKenzie County, North Dakota, An easement and right-of-way across, 242.0 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 2: SW1/4SE1/4 Section 11: NE1/4, McKenzie County, North Dakota, An easement and right-of-way across and others
FIRST CANADA (B.V.I) CORPORATION v. USA
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff: FIRST CANADA (B.V.I) CORPORATION
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Johnson v. San Mateo County
as 3:2024cv01905
Plaintiff: James Johnson
Defendant: San Mateo County
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2321 Plant Variety Protection Act
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Additional Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way Over Land in Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2024cv00029
Plaintiff: United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant: Additional Rights, Etc., More or Less, in Bedford County Tennessee, and, Manuel Quinonez Silvestre, PennyMac Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
Port Arthur Pipeline L L C v. Lyons et al
as 2:2024cv00429
Plaintiff: Port Arthur Pipeline L L C
Defendant: Kenneth Paul Lyons, Helen Jean Schumacher Lyons, Robert Charles Babcock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Additional Rights, Etc., More or Less, in Bedford County Tennessee, and et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff: United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant: Additional Rights, Etc., More or Less, in Bedford County Tennessee, and, Dr. John H. Gilmore and Vickie S. Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. .025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 2026 West Lanvale Street in Baltimore City, Maryland 21217 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00853
Plaintiff: National Railroad Passenger Corporation(Amtrak)
Defendant: .025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 2026 West Lanvale Street in Baltimore City, Maryland 21217, 2009 DRR-ETS LLC, ETS Maryland, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
Williamson et al v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00600
Plaintiff: Justina Williamson and Brian Williamson
Defendant: Phoenix, City of, Michael Sullivan, Anthony Winter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Property Damage (P.I.)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?