Cases 61 - 70 of 831,062
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PC) Gaither v. Williams. et al.
as 1:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Burrell A Gaither
Defendant:
Williams, A. George, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eisenhardt v. Huebschen et al
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Keirk Eisenhardt
Defendant:
Jerry Huebschen and Fourteenth Avenue Cartage Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Haffner et al v. The Potomac Edison Company
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Mark Haffner and Tiffany Haffner
Defendant:
The Potomac Edison Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Gude v. Does
as 4:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Corey Gude
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duke v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Donna J Duke
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Baghirzade v. Armenian National Committee of America, et al
as 3:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Aynur Baghirzade
Defendant:
Armenian National Committee of America, Aram Hamparian, Armenian National Committee of American Western Region and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ross v. Schlaman #1758 et al
as 3:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Sean Dion Ross
Defendant:
Schlaman #1758, Leach #1758, City of San Diego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Macomber et al
as 3:2024cv01079
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Wilson
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, James Hill, M. Colnier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
