Cases 101 - 110 of 16,263
Shields v. City of Houston
as 4:2024cv01291
Plaintiff:
Tye Shields
Defendant:
City of Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Standard Insurance Company v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Standard Insurance Company
Defendant:
James Kelvin Johnson, Brandon Houston and Taurian Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Bartek v. Retina Consultants of Houston, PLLC
as 4:2024cv01272
Plaintiff:
Stuart Bartek
Defendant:
Retina Consultants of Houston, PLLC doing business as Retina Consultants of Texas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SB IP Holdings, LLC v. Vivint, Inc.
as 24-1874
Appellant:
SB IP HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
VIVINT, INC.
Thomas v. Beadle
as 2:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
William Thomas
Defendant:
Faye Beadle, R. Houston and Captain Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. City of Houston, Texas
as 24-20150
Plaintiff:
Harriet Payne, Charles Payne, Jr., Cavin Payne and others
Defendant:
City of Houston, Texas
(PC) Jones v. Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00928
Petitioner:
Wayne E. Jones
Respondent:
Richard J Donovan Correctional Facility, J. Hill, California Department of Corrections Rehabilitation Administration Policy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Parks v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
John Houston Parks, Jr.
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Sgt. Sykes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
