Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in Kansas matching "S"
Cases 111 - 120 of 831,808
Staffney v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv11678
Plaintiff: Harold Staffney
Defendant: Heidi E. Washington, Robert A. Benson, David G. Kamm and others
Alward v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00663
Petitioner: Matthew Keith Alward
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MTD Investments, Inc. v. Jantan et al
as 2:2024cv05518
Plaintiff: MTD Investments, Inc.
Defendant: Abdul Mukti Bin Jantan and Aidah Binti Abdullah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Rogne v. City of Catoosa
as 4:2024cv00307
Plaintiff: John Rogne
Defendant: City of Catoosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01576
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03907
Plaintiff: M. S.
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ASHJARI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv07349
Plaintiff: BEHNAM ASHJARI
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
City of Logan, Ohio v. Stantec Consulting Services Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03547
Plaintiff: City of Logan, Ohio
Defendant: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. and Fluidra USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
GREENE v. IDT ENERGY et al
as 2:2024cv02824
Plaintiff: AYANNA GREENE
Defendant: IDT ENERGY, PARK POWER LLC and ROUND TABLE MARKETING LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01194
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?